Legal Opinion

Kohler v. Croonenberghs

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2003No. 03-272PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Thisis an appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court’s opinion and order granting partial summary judgment against Albert A. and Rose S. Croonenberghs (the Croonenberghs) on Counts II and III of the amended complaint of Dale T. and Jeanne M. Kohler (the Kohlers), seeking, among other things, an order establishing a fence line and a 1976 survey line as the boundary between the Kohlers’ and the Croonenberghs’ respective properties.

¶2 By way of further background, on May 31,2000, the Kohlers filed their Amended Complaint and Demand for Trial by Jury against the Croonenberghs, Erma W.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roy v. NeibauerMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Weinstein v. UNIVERSITY OF MONTANAMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Reidy v. Anaconda-Deer Lodge CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Flora v. ClearmanMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Rogers v. Lewis & Clark Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Fitzpatrick v. Trail CreekMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Matter of Rules of Appellate ProcedMontana Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API