Legal Opinion

Matter of Wolf

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 1992No. C2-91-870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDEBRING, Justice.

The state appeals from a decision of the court of appeals which held that under Minn.Stat. § 253B.09, subd. 1 a chemically dependent person who refuses all treatment may not be involuntarily committed because no facility or program is capable of meeting the patient’s needs. We reverse.

The facts are undisputed. Respondent has been admitted to the Hennepin County Detoxification Center 226 times, including 47 times from February 1990 to February 5, 1991. During that period, he spent about half of the year in the detoxification center. Respondent has no permanent address; when…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re D.M.C.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Matter of RiceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. In Re McCaskillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. In Re BlodgettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Matter of KellorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API