Williams v. Clink
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Eepievin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.
The plaintiff brought replevin in the Muskegon circuit court for certain law-books and office furniture, under a chattel mortgage which he claimed to hold against the property. The defendant claimed that the mortgage was given without consideration. The jury found for the defendant, who waived a return of the property, and had judgment for it's value in the sum of $899.91.
The mortgage was executed September 2, 1886, for the sum of $1,000, and had been duly renewed each year. It was claimed by the plaintiff that the property was mortgaged in 1881 to the administrators of one Allen for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bassett v. ShepardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Judge v. VogelMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brownell Realty, Inc v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Carmody v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Lefmann v. BrillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- In re Teller's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Harcrow v. GardinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900