Legal Opinion

People v. Siegl

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1996No. 93CA1600Published

1Opinion of the Court

914 P.2d 511 (1996)

The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Robert A. SIEGL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93CA1600.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

February 8, 1996.

Gale A. Norton, Attorney General, Stephen K. ErkenBrack, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Timothy M. Tymkovich, Solicitor General, Eric V. Field, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael J. McCarthy, Hotchkiss, for Defendant-Appellant.

Opinion by Judge ROTHENBERG.

Defendant, Robert A. Siegl, appeals his multiple convictions for possession and cultivation of controlled substances. We affirm.

On…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. People v. DaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API