Gould v. Adams
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Walter Van Dyke, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court rendered upon the former appeal in Gould v. Wise, 97 Cal. 532, and in the opinion rendered upon this appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendant Adams to plaintiff’s testatrix, in which John Wise was made a party defendant on the ground that he had a mortgage on the same land alleged to be subsequent and subject to that of plaintiff. Wise-answered, and also filed a cross-complaint claiming that his mortgage was prior and superior to that of plaintiff' and praying that it be foreclosed as such. On the first, trial of the cause the plaintiff prevailed and the defendant appealed. This court reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for a new trial. (Gould v. Wise, 97…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gould v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoyt v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Blochman v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Burkett v. DotyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Imperial Water Co. No. 1 v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.