Legal Opinion

Rigdon v. Barfield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 27, 1942No. 14129PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

On application of the rulings announced in the first three headnotes, the petition as originally drawn presented no cause of action. Did the amendment setting up that the actual date of the .deed was January 5, 1929, and praying for its reformation, save it? The petition as amended is met by a demurrer which invokes the doctrine of laches, and insists that by reason thereof the complainant is not entitled to the relief prayed for. Eleven years, nine months, and three days elapsed between the time the deed is alleged to have been actually executed and delivered and the date of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Estes v. OdomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Anderson v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Marler v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Printup v. Alexander & WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. LoudermilkSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Albany Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Milburn v. Nationwide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. C & G Candler, Inc. v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. LOUDERMILKSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API