State Road Department v. United States
District Court, N.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DE VANE, District Judge.
Memorandum of Court’s Ruling upon Motion to Strike Part of Plaintiff’s Defenses to Defendant’s Counterclaim.
Defendant has moved the court to strike the following portions of plaintiff’s defenses to the counterclaim:
1. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the First Defense.
2. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Second Defense.
3. Plaintiff’s Third Defense.
4. Plaintiff’s Fourth Defense.
5. The following clause in Plaintiff’s Fifth Defense — “denies it has consented to the adjudication of the counterclaim.”
When this phase of this litigation was before the court on plaintiff’s motion to strike…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Wojciuk v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1947
- O'Keefe v. Staples Coal Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1910
- Multnomah County v. Hammond Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Bewick v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Somerset Seafood Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Petition of Canal Barge CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1971
- United States v. State Road Department of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Somerset Seafood Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1951
- United States v. State Road Department of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951