Hanfgarn v. Mark
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
In the case of Fearon v. Treanor (272 N. Y. 268) we decided that chapter 263 of the Laws of 1935 (Civil Practice Act, §§ 61-a, 61-i), which abolished civil actions to recover damages for alienation of affections, criminal conversation, seduction, and breach of promise to marry, is constitutional in so far as it applies to an action to recover damages for breach of promise to marry, but expressly limited our decision in that case to the issue then before us. In that case it was argued that the entire act was unconstitutional and void, as it deprived an injured person of a remedy for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Fearon v. TreanorNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Wade v. . KalbfleischNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Foot v. CardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
3Cited by41 opinions
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.