Legal Opinion
Medina-Rodriguez v. Farmacia Medina Inc.
United States District Court
Decided December 20, 2017No. Civil No. 17–1672 (FAB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BESOSA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Norberto Medina-Rodriguez ("Medina") commenced this action on May 19, 2017, alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Docket Nos. 1 & 27; see 42 U.S.C. §§ 1201 et seq. Defendants Farmacia Medina, Inc. and Farmacia Medina Num. 2, Inc. (collectively, "Farmacia Medina defendants") have filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (" Rule 12(b)(6)"). (Docket No. 36.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The Court takes the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rodriguez-Reyes v. Molina-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Betancourt Colon, Faustino Xavier v. Tivoli Foods & Sport IncTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2024
- Medina-Rodriguez v. Canovanas Plaza RialDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021