Legal Opinion
May v. Autozone Stores, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided December 14, 2001No. 1:00CV449-D-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVIDSON, Chief Judge.
Presently before the court is the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Upon due consideration, the court finds that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
A. Factual Background
The Plaintiff, Michelle May, was hired by Defendant Autozone Stores, Inc. (“Au-tozone”) on or about June 4, 1997 to work in their store in Ripley, Mississippi. May was interviewed and hired by Joseph Buehrle. During May’s employment, Joseph Buehrle and Tommy Tyler were the area advisors over the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- V. City of Jackson Municipal School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2005