Legal Opinion

Kopplow Development, Inc. v. the City of San Antonio

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2013No. 11-0104PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guzman

In this case we determine whether an inverse condemnation claim is premature when premised on the owner’s inability to develop its property as the city previously approved. The landowner purchased the property for the purpose of developing the land, obtained permits, and filled the portion of the property at issue in this proceeding to the 100-year flood level. The municipality then constructed a facility partly on the property that would detain storm water on the property in a significant flood, thus causing the property to again be below the 100-year flood level and undevelopable without…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. City of Dallas v. JenningsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Tarrant Regional Water District v. GraggTexas Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. First United Pentecostal Church of Beaumont v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Harris County Flood Control District v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. City of Houston v. James & Elizabeth CarlsonTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Reaves v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. In re ButtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API