Legal Opinion
People v. Marroquin
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1989No. B039831PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
210 Cal.App.3d 77 (1989)
258 Cal. Rptr. 290
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ANTONIO MARROQUIN, Defendant and Appellant.
Docket No. B039831.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.
May 4, 1989.
COUNSEL
Saul M. Ferster for Defendant and Appellant.
James K. Hahn, City Attorney, William N. Sterling and Cindy B. Clemens, Deputy City Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
ARABIAN, J.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Antonio Marroquin appealed his conviction in the municipal court for violation of Penal Code section 12025, subdivision (b),[1] carrying a concealed weapon. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. RistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Palmer v. AgeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. Arturo H.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015