Manley, Bennett, McDonald & Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
In an Opinion and Order dated June 22, 1992 I ruled that defendant St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. is obligated, by virtue of two bonds it issued to plaintiff Manley, Bennett, McDonald & Co., to defend and indemnify plaintiff against certain third party claims. After the claims were resolved through settlement, plaintiff initiated this action against St. Paul for reimbursement of legal fees and the cost of settlement associated with its defense of these claims. On December 5, 1992, I denied defendant’s motion for reconsideration.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Wilson v. Doehler-Jarvis Division of National Lead Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Solakis v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. v. Old Kent BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- R.D. Management Corp. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Nelson v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025