Legal Opinion
Frye v. St. Joseph Railway, Light, Heat & Power Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 9, 1936Published
1Opinion
On Motion EOR Rehearing.
BLAND, J.
In addition to that part of the testimony of the motorman set out in the original opinion, he testified as follows:
"I could see down the track but I could not see on the track and for that reason I changed that. I could have seen a man standing up or a man sitting down — -I could have seen that — but I misunderstood if you could see down the track. I could see down the track but I could not see anything laying down on the ground in the grass.
"Q. Up until the time this occurred had you made a stop since you left Savannah? A. Just the one at Stop 8 when I…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bond v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Gould v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Orlann v. LaederichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Lolordo v. LacySupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Bushman v. BarlowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.