Legal Opinion
Dittes v. ChargeAfter USA, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 17, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00746Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TIA DITTES, Plaintiff, No. 24-CV-746 (RA) v. MEMORANDUM CHARGEAFTER USA, INC., OPINION & ORDER CHARGEAFTER, INC., MARK DENMAN, individually, and MICHAEL WILDE, individually, Defendants. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Tia Dittes commenced this action against her former employers ChargeAfter, Inc. and ChargeAfter USA, Inc. (jointly “ChargeAfter”), and former supervisors Mark Denman and Michael Wilde (collectively “Defendants”), alleging violations of New York State Human Rights Law, New York City Human Rights…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.