Legal Opinion

INVERSIONES YV3343, S.A. v. LYNX FBO FORT LAUDERDALE, LLC

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 10, 2024No. 0:21-cv-60197Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 21-cv-60197-ALTMAN/Hunt INVERSIONES YV3343, C.A., Plaintiff, v. LYNX FBO FORT LAUDERDALE, LLC, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ORDER Inversiones YV3343, C.A. (“Inversiones”), our Plaintiff, has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (“Pl.’s MSJ”) [ECF No. 72]. After careful review, that Motion is GRANTED in part as to the Defendant’s Eighth Affirmative Defense and DENIED in part as to all other requested relief. We’ll thus proceed with this case to trial. THE FACTS1 On March 15, 2020, Inversiones, a Venezuelan…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API