Legal Opinion
Matsumaru v. Sato
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided November 14, 2007No. CV 07-206-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys Fees. For the reasons stated herein, this Motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Suguru Sato fired Plaintiff S. Jay Matsumaru, an employee of Sato’s company Total Lawn Care, on or about May 13, 2004. (Doc. 1). On or about June 26, 2004, Sato and Matsumaru met to resolve employment-related issues arising from Matsumaru’s termination. Id. During that meeting Sato allegedly assaulted and intentionally inflicted emotional distress (“IIED”) upon Matsumaru. Id. On September 20, 2004, Matsumaru and Sato…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni NourseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re LetourneauUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Klein v. City of Laguna BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Garrow v. Tucson Clips LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Latanya Williams v. P.I. Properties No. 42, L.P.District Court, C.D. California · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.