Legal Opinion
Latanya Williams v. P.I. Properties No. 42, L.P.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 28, 2022No. 2:22-cv-05023Unknown
1Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-05023-ODW-JPR Document 36 Filed 11/28/22 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:150 O 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 LATANYA WILLIAMS, Case № 2:22-cv-05023-ODW (JPRx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER SANCTIONING SO CAL 13 EQUAL ACCESS GROUP IN THE 14 v. AMOUNT OF $8,001 (FRCP 11) AND 15 DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT TO P.I. PROPERTIES NO. 42, L.P., SETTLEMENT 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 After Plaintiff Latanya Williams moved for default judgment against Defendant 21 P.I. Properties No. 42, L.P. for construction access barrier-related…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Roberts v. Royal Atlantic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United National Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. R&d Latex Corporation, a Georgia Corporation Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., a California Corporation, and Mydrin, Inc., for Itself and as Successor in Interest to R&d Latex Corp., Mydrin, Inc., for Itself and as Successor in Interest to R&d Latex Corp., Plaintiff-Counter v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, and William C. Morison-Knox and Michael D. ProughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Barber v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Reena Frailich v. Sandra DisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.