Legal Opinion
Lebanon Iron Co. v. Donnelly & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 6, 1928No. 3257PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
Receivers were appointed for Donnelly & Co., with leave to continue, pending further order of the court, the active conduct of the business. The receivers were authorized by order of the court to borrow upon receivers’ certificates $20,000 to be used in the conduct of the business. On May 6, 1925, they borrowed upon their certificate $10,000 from the Com Exchange Bank of Philadelphia. The receivers Opened a deposit account with the bank, in which they were credited with the amount of the 'Certificate, and in which they also deposited moneys derived from their conduct…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Marine Bank v. Fulton BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Thompson v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Lehman Bros. v. Tallassee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cusanno v. Fidelity Bank (In Re Cusanno)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- United States v. Thomas Henry Mowry MikeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In the Matter of A. M. Townson & Co., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Charles A. Eaton Co. v. Louis Mark Shoes, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
- In the Matter of A. M. Townson & Co., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.