Legal Opinion

Davis v. Palmetto Quarries Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1948No. 16087PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, J.:

Appeal was originally filed by the defendant in an action against it in the Richland County Court by Amanda Howard Neal, plaintiff. That appeal has been discontinued by consent, but upon request of all counsel engaged we proceed to determine it as if Alice Davis were respondent. She is the plaintiff in an identical action in the lower court and is the respondent in a similar, pending appeal. The proceedings in the County Court in both actions were the same.

The action is for damages and to abate an alleged nuisance. It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff for a long prior time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woods v. Rock Hill Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  2. Frost v. Berkeley Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  3. Williams v. Haile Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Babb v. Lee County Landfill SC, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Meyerson v. MalinowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Priester v. BrabhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Dill v. Dance Freight LinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API