Kellogg v. Story County
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Dissent
Kiñtzinger, J.
(dissenting) — The question for consideration is whether or not the board had the power to reduce the salary of the superintendent after once fixing it at $2,100 per year, in January, 1931.
In the absence of any prohibition or restrictions by the Constitution or statutes of the state, the compensation of a municipal officer may be changed by the proper authorities, and such change may apply to officers then serving as well as those thereafter elected. 48 C. J. 699, section 1163; Iowa City v. Foster, 10 Iowa 189.
When, however, restrictions against changing the salaries exist,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- BUTLER v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Mial v. Ellington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- District Township of Dubuque v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- County of Douglas v. TimmeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- County of Yuma v. SturgesArizona Supreme Court · 1914
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.