Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Howlett v. Cheetham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1898No. 2925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Per curiam

The relator seeks by this proceeding to compel the state auditor to issue to him a warrant for his salary as arid land commissioner, claimed to have been earned since March 25th last. He held' the position under appointment of the executive and his term would not have expired by limitation until June 16, 1899, under the act, Laws 1895, p. 452. On March 25th aforesaid, action was taken by the governor as follows:

“ State of Washington, Executive Department,

Olympia, March 25th, 1898.

Whereas, The State of Washington contains a large area of arid land which under the provisions of an act of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. McReavy v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hamilton v. GrantWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Kimball v. OlmstedWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State Ex Rel. Davis v. JohnsWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State ex rel. Fay v. EasterdayWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Eric Johnson, Apps/cross-resp v. Wa State Conservation Comm., Resps/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API