Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Davis v. Johns

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1926No. 20033. En BancPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is an action in the nature of quo warranto to try the title to the office of regent of the state university.

The information alleges that, heretofore, the then governor appointed the relator to the office for the term of six years beginning on the second Monday of March, 1922, and that he accepted the appointment and qualified and ever since the second Monday of March, 1922, he has been a duly appointed, qualified and .acting regent of the university; that on the 4th day of May, 1926, the governor filed with the secretary of state, and the secretary of state thereafter forthwith sent a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State ex rel. McReavy v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Howlett v. CheethamWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State ex rel. Fay v. EasterdayWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Quick-Ruben v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Dunbar v. State Board of EqualizationWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Municipal Court v. BeighleWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Lowman & Hanford Co. v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API