Legal Opinion

Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. Cnty. of Maui

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 2018No. 15-17447PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Dorothy W. Nelson, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

*741The Opinion filed on February 1, 2018, is amended as follows:

1. On slip opinion page 12, footnote 2, the following text was added to the end of the footnote: < hence, it does not affect our analysis that some of sister circuits have concluded groundwater is a navigable water.> See Rice v. Harken Expl. , 250 F.3d 264, 270 (5th Cir. 2001) ; Vill. of Oconomowoc Lake v. Dayton Hudson Corp. , 24 F.3d 962, 965 (7th Cir. 1994). We are not suggesting that the CWA regulates all groundwater.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Inland Empire Waterkeeper v. Corona Clay Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Ky. Waterways Alliance v. Kentucky Util. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Day, LLC v. Plantation Pipe Line Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
  4. Black Warrior River-Keeper, Inc. v. Drummond Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
  5. United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API