Rice v. Braden
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 260, Oct. T., 1913, by plaintiffs, from decree of O. P. Washington Co., No. 2129, in Equity, sustaining demurrer to a bill to declare a trust, in case of Maggie A. Rice, Peter Kane, Daniel Kane, Owen Kane, John Bellew, Malacby Bellew, Josepb Bellew and Bernard Bellew, v. Anna Braden and O. D. Bleakley, Trustee under tbe last will and testament of Sara McKeown (so calling herself) now deceased.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 260, Oct. T., 1913, by plaintiffs, from decree of O. P. Washington Co., No. 2129, in Equity, sustaining demurrer to a bill to declare a trust, in case of Maggie A. Rice, Peter Kane, Daniel Kane, Owen Kane, John Bellew, Malacby Bellew, Josepb Bellew and Bernard Bellew, v. Anna Braden and O. D. Bleakley, Trustee under tbe last will and testament of Sara McKeown (so calling herself) now deceased. Bill in equity to declare defendants’ trustees ex maleficio. ■ The facts appear by the following opinion of Mc-Ilvaine, P. J., sur defendants’ demurrer to plaintiffs’ bill: John McKeown died…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The decree of the Court of Common Pleas sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the plaintiff’s bill is affirmed on the opinion of Judge McIlvaine.
2Cited by31 opinions
- Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- In Re Anjopa Paper & Board Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Hoppin v. LongMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Kepler v. KeplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Schuster v. LargmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.