Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. Town of Brookline

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 5, 1945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

These are three actions of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained in circumstances set forth below. The actions are brought by the same plaintiff against the town of Brookline, the Brookline Trust Company and Cyril ,C. Reynolds, doing business as Milton F. Reynolds & Son, respectively. The cases come before us on the plaintiff’s exception to the action of the judge in allowing the defendant’s motion in each case for a directed verdict.

The evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff would have warranted the jury in finding the following facts: On November 28,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Woodman v. Metropolitan RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. McKenna v. AndreassiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Atwood v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Boomer v. WilburMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Pickett v. Waldorf System, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kai Jakobsen v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  2. Ram v. Town of CharltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Newton Construction Co. v. West & South Water Supply DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BillingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Fall River Line Pier, Inc. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API