Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mikkelsen v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 1991No. 89-11-9705-E; CA A66027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment finding him in contempt for failure to pay child support. We reverse.

In 1988, defendant was divorced and ordered to pay $150 a month child support. He made no payments. The district attorney issued a citation for him to show cause why he should not be held in contempt. The court treated the matter as a criminal contempt, informing defendant that he faced jail as a result of not having paid his support obligations. Counsel was appointed.

Neither defendant nor the state called witnesses or presented evidence. Nevertheless, the trial court believed that it had enough…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Hathaway v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Bar v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Blackwell v. BlackwellOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. Dwyer v. DwyerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Mikkelsen v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Yancy v. WilkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API