Legal Opinion
Patel v. Sun Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 15, 1996No. Civil Action 94-4318PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Prakash H. Patel and Shobha P. Patel (the “Patels”) brought this action against Defendants Sun Company, Inc. (“Sun”) and Lancaster Associates (“Lancaster”) under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (the “PMPA”), 15 U.S.C.A §§ 2801-2841 (West 1982 & Supp.1996). On April 8, 1996, Sun moved for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 to dismiss with prejudice the complaint of the Patels. That same day, the Patels moved for partial summary judgment with respect to Sun’s liability under the PMPA Both motions are now…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rose Marks, D/B/A Middlebelt-Eureka Shell v. Shell Oil Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Gwynedd Properties, Inc. v. Lower Gwynedd Township, Catherine M. Harper, Edward J. Brandt, Janet H. Kirch, Richard Landis, and Robert McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Slatky, John v. Amoco Oil Company, Service Station Dealers of America, Inc., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Prakash H. Patel Shobha P. Patel, H/w v. Sun Company, Inc. Lancaster AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Patel v. Sun Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998