Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Milburn Bros., Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1998No. 1-97-1353PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

The issue in this case is whether Herbert R. Schmidt’s personal injury action is barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1996)).

To answer the question we are required to determine whether two separate and independent corporations should be regarded as joint employers, or whether the two corporations were engaged in a joint enterprise at the time Schmidt was injured. If the answer to either one of these questions is yes, Schmidt’s lawsuit cannot proceed. Because we believe these are issues that should be decided by the trier of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pyne v. WitmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re Rehabilitation of Centaur Ins. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Orenic v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. Sharp v. GallagherIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Forsythe v. Clark USA, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ioerger v. HALVERSON CONST. CO., INC.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Trossman v. PhilipsbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Ioerger v. Halverson Const. Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Holten v. Syncreon North America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API