Legal Opinion

Intel Corporation v. Tela Innovations, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 1, 2021No. 3:18-cv-02848Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 INTEL CORPORATION, Case No. 3:18-cv-02848-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR 9 v. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, TO CERTIFY JUDGMENT, AND TO STAY 10 TELA INNOVATIONS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 308, 309, 320, 321, 323, 330, Defendant. 11 334 12 13 INTRODUCTION 14 In December 2020, I granted a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement brought 15 by plaintiff Intel Corporation (“Intel”). I found that several of Intel’s products did not literally 16 infringe the asserted claims of five patents of defendant Tela Innovations, Inc.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API