Legal Opinion
Joseph Beck & Sons v. Danaher
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 15, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint at Trial Term.
1Opinion of the CourtDelehanty, J.
On February 21, 1914, a written agreement was entered into between the parties- hereto whereby defendant was engaged as a salesman, the contract containing the following provisions:
‘ ‘ Second. The parties of the first part agree to pay to the party of the second part one hundred dollars per week during the continuance of this agreement, which sum shall include all expenses and disbursements incurred by the party of the second part.
“ Third. As a condition precedent to the party of the second part receiving the sum above mentioned he agrees to sell for the parties of the first part, goods,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Michaels v. . FishelNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hurst v. Trow's Printing & Bookbinding Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Kupfer v. HoltzmannAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Bogart Manufacturing Corp. v. Franklin Fibre Lamitex Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Excello Hosiery Mills v. HirschNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935