Legal Opinion

Alropa Corp. v. Britton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 30, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

This action of assumpsit, commenced on July 31, 1936, is brought to recover the amounts due upon three promissory notes made by the defendants on December 16, 1925, at Miami, Florida. The defendants, having resided at Rumford, Maine, more than six years next prior to. the commencement of this action, pleaded the statute of limitations. The case is reported on an agreed statement of facts.

The notes in suit were each for $3125 and payable respectively in twelve, twenty-four, and thirty-six months after date. They were written into forms on which appeared at the right of both lines for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of the United States v. DonnallySupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. Le Roy v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Mandru v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  4. Lamberton v. GrantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
  5. Nowell v. WatermanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hossler Ex Rel. Dows v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Sohn v. BernsteinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  3. Ouellette v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. General Petroleum Corp. v. Seaboard Terminals Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1938
  5. Doughty v. Maine Central Transportation Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API