Legal Opinion

General Petroleum Corp. v. Seaboard Terminals Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 28, 1938No. 6077PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The controlling question in this case is whether the defendant’s contract of guaranty, the cause of action in the case, is to be treated as a sealed or simple contract. If sealed, the plaintiff is entitled to a verdict, but if only a simple contract the suit is barred by limitations. The question was discussed but not decided in a former opinion dealing with the subject matter as it arose on the pleadings only. D.C., 19 F.Supp. 882. The case has now been tried and submitted for final decision on testimony and argument, a jury having been waived by the parties in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Koehler v. Black River Falls Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Coral Gables, Inc. v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  5. Coltraro v. LotusoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Klein v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. County Commissioners for Carroll County v. Forty West Builders, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. President of Georgetown College v. MaddenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  4. Mayor of Federalsburg v. Allied Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Tipton v. Partner's Management Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API