Legal Opinion

Peter M. Roberts, Cross-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 3, 1978No. 77-1354 and 77-1499PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.

The major issues in this case are whether the district court properly declined to decide the validity of plaintiff’s patent in a suit for fraud, breach of a confidential relationship and negligent misrepresentation in defendant’s procurement of an assignment of plaintiff’s patent rights and whether the district court properly concluded that plaintiff had elected his legal remedies and, therefore, was barred from seeking his equitable remedies of rescission and restitution.

I

This case involves the efforts of one of this nation’s largest retail companies, Sears, Roebuck &…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Broomfield v. KosowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Kester v. CrillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. James S. Jordan, Cross-Appellee v. Duff and Phelps, Inc., Claire v. Hansen, and Francis E. Jeffries, Defendants- Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Diamond Scientific Co. v. Ambico, Inc. And Clarence Joseph WelterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. N.I.S. Corp. v. Hallahan (In re Hallahan)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. Benson v. StaffordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API