Legal Opinion

Muller v. City of Philadelphia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1906PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Thomas W. Evans Museum and Institute Society, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 28tli day of February, 1906, denying said defendant’s motion for leave to amend its answer herein.

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin, J.:

The plaintiffs, as executors and trustees under the will of Thomas W. Evans, deceased, brought this action to have the will and a compromise agreement construed in relation to certain land_s in the city of New York and for instructions as to their duties in respect to a sale of the whole or a part of such lands, and the disposition of the proceeds derived therefrom if a sale be directed. • The testator died in the city of Paris,. France, on the 14th of November, 1897, leaving him surviving as his only relatives a brother and his *94descendants and the descendants of two deceased…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. . BowenNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hanna v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Washington Life Insurance v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Green Point Savings Bank v. Central Gardens Unit No. 1, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. People v. OstranderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Partridge v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API