Legal Opinion

Partridge v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant made a motion at Special Term for permission to serve an amended answer setting up as a new defense that the policy sued upon had expired by its terms before the plaintiff’s intestate received the injury which the complaint alleges caused his death. The learned Special Term held that the defendant was not guilty of laches, but denied the motion upon the ground that the proposed defense is insufficient, as a matter of law, to raise an issue. (124 Misc. 634.)

Ordinarily the court will riot, on a motion to amend, determine the merits of the proposed amendment, but will leave the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muller v. City of PhiladelphiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Partridge v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. Barlow CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Lee v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
  3. Gillette v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. Ponticello v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Fitzgerald Bros. Construction Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API