Aros v. American Shipbuilding Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*292OPINION
By STEVENS, J.
Two questions are here presented:
1. Was plaintiff, while engaged in making repairs upon a boat located in a permanent dry dock, built upon the land, engaged in maritime employment?
2. If engaged in maritime employment, could plaintiff and defendant, by conformance to the regulations and orders of the Industrial Commission of Ohio, place themselves under the jurisdiction of said Industrial Commission of Ohio in such manner as to preclude either party from thereafter challenging such jurisdiction?
Counsel for plaintiff and defendant have submitted exhaustive briefs and have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- The Robert W. ParsonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Peyroux and Others v. HOWARD AND VARION.Supreme Court of the United States · 1833
- The Steamship JeffersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Toy Toy v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.