Prichard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Matthew Prichard appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s (MetLife) decision to deny him long-term disability benefits under the long term disability plan of his employer, IBM. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Prichard argues that the district court erred in reviewing MetLife’s decision for an abuse of discretion, rather than de novo. He argues in the alternative that even if the district court was correct in using the abuse of discretion standard, MetLife abused its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- EUGENE S. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Penny Grosz-Salomon v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, a Provident Company Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sandra Peters v. Aetna IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Daniel Demer v. IBM Corp Ltd PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Danielle Mull v. Motion Picture Industry HealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Daniel Warmenhoven v. Netapp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Nieves v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.