Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Alliance Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1937No. 8223PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The appellant sued in equity to cancel, as paid, certain deeds of trust made to secure his notes and for a recovery of over-payments. The notes were made in 1919, and the last of them matured in 1930. The theory of the bill is that the transaction of loan was usurious and otherwise violative of law, so that payments already made are to be so dealt with as to justify the relief sought, although the notes according to their terms show a large amount still un paid. He had sought relief by a composition in bankruptcy under Bankruptcy Act, § 74, as added by Act March 3, 1933,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Seeman v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Coghlan v. South Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Miller v. TiffanySupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  5. Pinney v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kronovet v. LipchinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Fahs v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. United States v. Biloxi Municipal School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1963
  4. Jenkins v. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  5. Fahs v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API