Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Ramos)

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1991No. Docket Nos. B058610, B058606PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

—In these consolidated cases, we decide the issue of whether a trial court may lawfully give a statutorily classified “career criminal” an “indicated sentence.” We hold that the statutory scheme governing the prosecution of “career criminals,” Penal Code section 999b et seq., does not prohibit a trial court from indicating the sentence it will impose if a given set of facts is confirmed and the accused enters a guilty plea to all pending charges and admits all special allegations. As we shall explain, in both of these cases, each superior court judge thoroughly familiarized…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Unzueta v. Ocean View School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. ClanceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. TrauschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. AlbertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API