People v. Superior Court (Ramos)
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
—In these consolidated cases, we decide the issue of whether a trial court may lawfully give a statutorily classified “career criminal” an “indicated sentence.” We hold that the statutory scheme governing the prosecution of “career criminals,” Penal Code section 999b et seq., does not prohibit a trial court from indicating the sentence it will impose if a given set of facts is confirmed and the accused enters a guilty plea to all pending charges and admits all special allegations. As we shall explain, in both of these cases, each superior court judge thoroughly familiarized…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Unzueta v. Ocean View School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. ClanceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. TrauschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. AlbertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.