Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. Hodurski
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
I dissent. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama ("BCBS") argues that in order for nonstock corporations organized pursuant to Article 6 of Chapter 4 of Title 10 of the Alabama Code of 1975 ("Title 10 insurers") to be subject to insurance statutes, the Legislature must expressly amend § 10-4-115 to so state. BCBS also points out that this requirement is repeated in Title 27 of the Alabama Code, which has its own exemption statute. See §27-1-4(2), Ala. Code 1975, providing:
"This title [Title 27] shall not apply as to:
". . . .
"(2) Nonprofit corporations for establishment of hospitalization plan…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. NielsenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Fletcher v. Tuscaloosa Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Ex Parte JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Alabama Power Co. v. Citizens of StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- State v. Bay Towing & Dredging CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.