Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Zahniser Graphics, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1995No. B078923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), J.

Introduction

Kenneth McCoy was injured at work while operating a printing press. McCoy sued, inter alia, his employer, Zahniser Graphics, Inc. To avoid the exclusivity provisions of the workers’ compensation system, McCoy relied upon Labor Code section 4558. That section permits an employee to file a personal injury action against the employer when the injury results from use of a power press which lacks a safety device referred to as a point of operation guard. Zahniser was granted summary judgment on the basis that the printing press involved in the accident was not a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ceja v. J. R. Wood, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Award Metals, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Graham v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosales v. Depuy Ace Medical Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Herrera v. Unistar Food Processing CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Rosales v. Depuy Ace Medical Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Salgado v. Modern Meat CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API