Legal Opinion

New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. Logvinsky

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided January 9, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Emily Jane Goodman, J.

In this lawsuit, plaintiff hospital (H&H) seeks fees from the defendant (Ms. Logvinsky) a woman who gave birth at the hospital. The defendant, represented by pro bono counsel, has impleaded the Commissioner of the Human Resources Administration of the City of New York (HRA), on the theory that because Ms. Logvinsky is eligible for Medicaid, any liability of hers to the hospital is the third-party defendant’s liability.

Before this court is the third-party defendant’s (HRA) motion to dismiss the third-party complaint on several grounds. First, the HRA…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Valstrey Service Corp. v. Board of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Mount Sinai Hospital v. KornegayCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  3. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. GormanNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. JonesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Ambro, New York County Courts1987
  2. Staten Is. Univ. Hosp. v. QuinteroAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API