Legal Opinion

Guardian Building & Loan Ass'n v. McCallister

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1928Published

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

Plaintiff insists upon its right to advertise that its affairs are “controlled” and “supervised” by the State of Oregon, but “kicks like a bay steer” when the state exercises that right through the proper official. It is here trying to prevent the state from controlling or supervising the adoption of a by-law or to control or supervise its advertising. The statute directs the corporation commissioner through an assistant “to supervise, inspect and examine all building and loan * * associations doing business in the State of Oregon,” etc. It does not assume nor authorize any official to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
  2. James v. City of NewbergOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Astoria v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Northern Pacific Railroad v. RaymondSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888
  5. Hartley v. Sherman CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API