Summerlin v. Shellpoint Mortgage Services

MEMORANDUM OPINION

R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. Introduction

The court has before it Defendant Shell-point Mortgage Services’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Doc. # 14), filed April 24, 2015. Shellpoint filed a Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 15). Plaintiff1 had the opportunity to file a responsive brief but did not do so. Therefore, Shellpoint’s Motion is ripe for review. For the reasons outlined below, the court finds that the Motion is due to be granted and this case is due to be dismissed with prejudice.

II. Facts and Procedural History

Pl…