Legal Opinion

In Re Parker

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 4, 2006No. 18-01655PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF ORDER PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(c)(4)(A)(ii) AND 362(j) CONFIRMING THAT NO AUTOMATIC STAY IS IN EFFECT

CECELIA G. MORRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPC-PA”) added several provisions to the Bankruptcy Code wherein the automatic stay, which normally arises whenever a bankruptcy case is commenced, is either limited in duration or not triggered. Because this case is the third filed by debtor John Parker in the past year, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(4) no stay went into effect, as to him,…

2Cited by9 opinions

Reswick v. Reswick (In Re Reswick)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
In Re JumppBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2006
In Re JupiterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
In Re DanielUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
In re RoachUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.