Legal Opinion

Hassell v. Steinmann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Dallas County Court; W. Ml Holland, Judge. Action by Lizzie Steinmann, executrix, against Irma Hassell and another. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

This suit was brought by the defendant in error, Lizzie Steinmann, against the plaintiffs in error upon a promissory note for the sum of $850. The petition alleges that Irma Yon Haxthausen executed her note to the plaintiff on the 14th day of January, 1907, due on the 5th day of January, 1908, with interest from date at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum, and providing for the payment of 10 per cent, attorney’s fees if not paid at maturity, and placed in the hands of an attorney for collection; that the same was due and had been placed in the hands of her attorney, who brought the action for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Houston v. Campbell Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Hammond v. AtleeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. O'Connell v. RugelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Bolton v. Gifford & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Estate of Dunovant v. Stafford Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beckham v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. Bybee v. Embree-Mclean Carriage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Bohlssen v. BohlssenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Bohlssen v. BohlssenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API