Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Local Union 26, Unite Here

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 3, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-10396-GAOPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

George A. O’Toole, Jr., United States District Judge

The Secretary of the United States Department of Labor (the “Department”) brought suit against Unite Here Local 26, alleging that the union violated § 104 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (“LMRDA”), 29 U.S.C. § 414, when it permitted a member of Local 26 to inspect the union’s collective bargaining agreements (“agreements” or “CBAs”) with employers other than the complainant’s employer but refused to permit her to take notes while reviewing those agreements. The union disagrees with the Secretary’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Wirtz v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees Union, Local 6Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API