Legal Opinion

McVeigh v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1912No. 17,406PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Anderson district court.

1Per curiam

The defendant asks for a rehearing because the opinion fails to refer to the defendant’s motion for an order for more definite averments in the petition. The motion in substance was to require the plaintiff to state the particular acts of its employees whereby the running of the train caused the fire, and wherein the running of the engine and train was negligent. The following quotation from the opinion in Railway Co. v. Garrison, 66 Kan. 625, 72 Pac. 225, is applicable to the question presented by this motion:

“It was said in St. L. & S. F. Rly. Co. v. Snaveley, 47 Kan. 637, 28 Pac. 615, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. SnaveleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murry v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API