Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Piedmont Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

This is an action to recover the penalty prescribed by statute (C. S., 2306) for taking, receiving, reserving or charging a greater rate of interest than six per centum per annum. The,legal rate of interest in this State is six per centum' pier annum, and no more. (C. S., 2305). Interest at a rate in excess of six per centum per annum, when knowingly taken, received, reserved of charged is usury.

The. penalty prescribed by statute for charging usury is forfeiture of the entire interest which the note or other evidence of debt carries with it, or which has been agreed to be paid thereon. A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cobb v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Tayloe v. Parker.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Rogers v. Bank of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Henderson v. SECURITY MORTAGAGE AND FINANCE CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Bundy v. . Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Bundy v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API